1963 Ferrari 250 GT vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 250 GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 250 GT would be higher. At 2,953 cc (12 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 250 GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT (251 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 250 GT should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1963 Ferrari 250 GT is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ferrari 250 GT. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 250 GT | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Ferrari | Smart |
Model | 250 GT | ForFour |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2953 cc | 1123 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 7500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 22 L |