1963 Ferrari 250 LM vs. 1968 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1968 Zastava 1300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 250 LM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 250 LM would be higher. At 3,286 cc (12 cylinders), 1963 Ferrari 250 LM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 250 LM (317 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1968 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 250 LM should accelerate faster than 1968 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Zastava 1300 weights approximately 134 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 250 LM.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ferrari 250 LM (314 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 Ferrari 250 LM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ferrari 250 LM | 1968 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Ferrari | Zastava |
Model | 250 LM | 1300 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 3286 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 314 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 984 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |