1963 Ferrari 250 LM vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 250 LM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 250 LM would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 317 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 720 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 250 LM.

Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ferrari 250 LM. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (373 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ferrari 250 LM. (314 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ferrari 250 LM. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1963 Ferrari 250 LM has manual transmission. 1963 Ferrari 250 LM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Ferrari 250 LM 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Ferrari Cadillac
Model 250 LM ATS
Year Released 1963 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Middle Front
Engine Size 3286 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 12 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 317 HP 317 HP
Engine RPM 7500 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 314 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 77 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 58.8 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear AWD
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 850 kg 1570 kg
Vehicle Length 4100 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1120 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 140 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]