1963 Fiat 1300 vs. 1980 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1980 Zastava 1300 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat 1300 would be higher. Both 1963 Fiat 1300 and 1980 Zastava 1300 are equipped with a 1,295 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Fiat 1300 (64 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Fiat 1300 should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 93 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat 1300 | 1980 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Fiat | Zastava |
Model | 1300 | 1300 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2430 mm |