1963 Fiat 1300 vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat 1300 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1963 Fiat 1300. (64 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1423 kg more than 1963 Fiat 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat 1300 | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 1300 | E-150 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 93 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 2383 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 132 L |
