1963 Fiat 1300 vs. 2005 Toyota Vitz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Vitz is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat 1300 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat 1300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Vitz (70 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1963 Fiat 1300. (64 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Vitz should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Vitz weights approximately 20 kg more than 1963 Fiat 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Fiat 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Vitz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Vitz (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat 1300. (93 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Vitz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat 1300 | 2005 Toyota Vitz | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | 1300 | Vitz |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 83.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 960 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 42 L |