1963 Fiat 1500 vs. 1999 Mazda Midge

To start off, 1999 Mazda Midge is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat 1500 would be higher. At 1,481 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Fiat 1500 (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1999 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Fiat 1500 should accelerate faster than 1999 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat 1500 weights approximately 259 kg more than 1999 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Fiat 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Fiat 1500 (106 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Fiat 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda Midge.

Compare all specifications: