1963 Fiat 1600 vs. 1950 Simca 8
To start off, 1963 Fiat 1600 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Simca 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Simca 8 would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Fiat 1600 (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1950 Simca 8. (33 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Fiat 1600 should accelerate faster than 1950 Simca 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat 1600 weights approximately 105 kg more than 1950 Simca 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat 1600 | 1950 Simca 8 | |
| Make | Fiat | Simca |
| Model | 1600 | 8 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1090 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 85 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2430 mm |
