1963 Fiat 1600 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat 1600 would be higher. At 1,568 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Fiat 1600. (85 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat 1600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat 1600 weights approximately 581 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat 1600 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Fiat | Westfield |
Model | 1600 | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1568 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1025 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2320 mm |