1963 Fiat 500 vs. 1962 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1963 Fiat 500 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 323 more horse power than 1963 Fiat 500. (22 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1963 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat 500 | 1962 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | 500 | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 499 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 345 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 540 kg | 1875 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3190 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1330 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1950 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 40 L |
