1963 Fiat 500 vs. 2000 Seat Arosa

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat 500 would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1963 Fiat 500. (22 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 749 kg more than 1963 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Fiat 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat 500. (36 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat 500.

Compare all specifications: