1963 Fiat Cabriolet vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Cabriolet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Cabriolet would be higher. At 1,221 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Cabriolet is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Fiat Cabriolet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Cabriolet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Cabriolet | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
Make | Fiat | Pininfarina |
Model | Cabriolet | Metrocubo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1221 cc | 505 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |