1963 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2002 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2002 Lancia Zeta is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lancia Zeta (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 310 kg more than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Lancia Zeta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lancia Zeta (181 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. 2002 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1963 Fiat Campagnola has manual transmission. 1963 Fiat Campagnola will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Campagnola | 2002 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Fiat | Lancia |
Model | Campagnola | Zeta |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 181 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 80 L |