1963 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2005 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2005 Hyundai Matrix is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,901 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Hyundai Matrix (120 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Hyundai Matrix should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Hyundai Matrix weights approximately 68 kg more than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Hyundai Matrix. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Hyundai Matrix (162 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Hyundai Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. 2005 Hyundai Matrix has automatic transmission and 1963 Fiat Campagnola has manual transmission. 1963 Fiat Campagnola will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Hyundai Matrix will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat Campagnola | 2005 Hyundai Matrix | |
| Make | Fiat | Hyundai |
| Model | Campagnola | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1901 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 128 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1358 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 55 L |
