1963 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. (62 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1963 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford E-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Campagnola. (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Campagnola | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Campagnola | E-350 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1901 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3650 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 57 L |