1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1964 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 304 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Fiat Grand Break (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Bluebird. (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1963 Fiat Grand Break will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Grand Break | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Grand Break | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2390 mm |