1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Cordoba (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 179 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat Grand Break | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | Fiat | Seat |
| Model | Grand Break | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2520 mm |
