1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2000 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2000 GMC Yukon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 5,300 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Yukon weights approximately 685 kg more than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Because 2000 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 GMC Yukon (442 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2000 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2000 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Fiat | GMC |
Model | Grand Break | Yukon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 442 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1955 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2990 mm |