1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Grand Break | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2490 mm |
