1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2005 Pontiac Montana
To start off, 2005 Pontiac Montana is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Pontiac Montana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Pontiac Montana (200 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Pontiac Montana weights approximately 716 kg more than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Pontiac Montana, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Pontiac Montana (285 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Pontiac Montana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2005 Pontiac Montana | |
Make | Fiat | Pontiac |
Model | Grand Break | Montana |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 285 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1986 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 95 L |