1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2008 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2008 Nissan Almera is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Almera weights approximately 260 kg more than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Fiat Grand Break (142 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Almera. (138 Nm). This means 1963 Fiat Grand Break will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Almera.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2008 Nissan Almera | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Grand Break | Almera |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1597 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1530 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 60 L |
