1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2009 Nissan 350Z
To start off, 2009 Nissan 350Z is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Nissan 350Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan 350Z (309 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan 350Z should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan 350Z (358 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan 350Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2009 Nissan 350Z | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Grand Break | 350Z |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 3498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 309 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 10.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1330 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 80 L |