1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 261 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Grand Break | UTE |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 142 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |