1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2010 Tesla Roadster
To start off, 2010 Tesla Roadster is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. In terms of performance, 2010 Tesla Roadster (288 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Tesla Roadster should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Fiat Grand Break weights approximately 35 kg more than 2010 Tesla Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Tesla Roadster (400 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm). This means 2010 Tesla Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2010 Tesla Roadster | |
Make | Fiat | Tesla |
Model | Grand Break | Roadster |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 400 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3947 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1128 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2352 mm |