1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Fiat Grand Break (96 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Fiat Grand Break should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Grand Break | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2490 mm |
