1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2011 Mazda 3

To start off, 2011 Mazda 3 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Fiat Grand Break is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 3 (113 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.

Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 3 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Fiat Grand Break 2011 Mazda 3
Make Fiat Mazda
Model Grand Break 3
Year Released 1963 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1793 cc 1560 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 96 HP 113 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 142 Nm 270 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 1750 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4490 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2660 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 L 55 L