1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2011 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2011 Renault Koleos is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 73 more horse power than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (96 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Renault Koleos weights approximately 380 kg more than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2011 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Grand Break | Koleos |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1793 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1855 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2690 mm |