1963 Fiat Grand Break vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Fiat Grand Break. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Fiat Grand Break would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mini Countryman weights approximately 70 kg more than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Because 1963 Fiat Grand Break is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Fiat Grand Break. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (155 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Fiat Grand Break. (142 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Fiat Grand Break.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Fiat Grand Break | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Fiat | Mini |
| Model | Grand Break | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4097 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1993 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 L | 47 L |
