1963 Ford Anglia vs. 2005 Mazda 6

To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (99 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1963 Ford Anglia. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Anglia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 567 kg more than 1963 Ford Anglia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Ford Anglia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Anglia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (244 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Anglia. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Anglia.

Compare all specifications: