1963 Ford Anglia vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Anglia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Anglia would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 193 more horse power than 1963 Ford Anglia. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Anglia.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Anglia. (85 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Anglia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Anglia | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Ford | Holden |
| Model | Anglia | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
