1963 Ford Consul vs. 2005 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2005 Toyota Celica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Consul would be higher. At 1,803 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Celica (180 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1963 Ford Consul. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Celica weights approximately 352 kg more than 1963 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Consul is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Consul. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Celica (176 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Consul. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Consul.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Consul | 2005 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Consul | Celica |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1803 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 85 Nm | 176 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.2 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 782 kg | 1134 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 55 L |