1963 Ford Consul vs. 2010 Nissan Note
To start off, 2010 Nissan Note is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Consul. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Consul would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Ford Consul. (45 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Consul. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Note weights approximately 270 kg more than 1963 Ford Consul. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Ford Consul is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Consul. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Consul | 2010 Nissan Note | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Consul | Note |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 45 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 782 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2600 mm |