1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180
To start off, 1963 Ford Cortina is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180 would be higher. At 1,767 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (49 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180 (104 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1954 Mercedes-Benz 180 | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Cortina | 180 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1767 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 45 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 104 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 100 L |