1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1964 Mini MK I
To start off, 1964 Mini MK I is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (49 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1964 Mini MK I. (34 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 1964 Mini MK I.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (90 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1964 Mini MK I | |
Make | Ford | Mini |
Model | Cortina | MK I |
Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 34 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 60 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2040 mm |