1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1964 Sunbeam Imp
To start off, 1964 Sunbeam Imp is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Cortina weights approximately 93 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Imp.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 1964 Sunbeam Imp | |
| Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
| Model | Cortina | Imp |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 875 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 72.8 mm | 60.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 747 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2090 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 27 L |
