1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1966 Saab 96
To start off, 1966 Saab 96 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Saab 96 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Saab 96 (64 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Saab 96 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Saab 96, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Saab 96 (116 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1966 Saab 96 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1966 Saab 96 | |
Make | Ford | Saab |
Model | Cortina | 96 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 64 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 116 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 58.9 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 38 L |