1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1967 Renault 10
To start off, 1967 Renault 10 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (49 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1967 Renault 10. (42 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 1967 Renault 10.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (90 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Renault 10. (77 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Renault 10.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1967 Renault 10 | |
Make | Ford | Renault |
Model | Cortina | 10 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 42 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 77 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 38 L |