1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1969 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1969 Mazda 1000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,558 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 49 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Cortina weights approximately 513 kg more than 1969 Mazda 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (85 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1969 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Cortina | 1000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 77 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 710 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 55 L |