1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1973 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Cortina weights approximately 371 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1973 Mazda RX-3 (135 Nm) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (85 Nm). This means 1973 Mazda RX-3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Ford | Mazda |
| Model | Cortina | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 100 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 852 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 36 L | 65 L |
