1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1974 Triumph Stag
To start off, 1974 Triumph Stag is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1974 Triumph Stag is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Triumph Stag (143 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Triumph Stag should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Triumph Stag (235 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1974 Triumph Stag will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1974 Triumph Stag | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Cortina | Stag |
Year Released | 1963 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 235 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 63 L |