1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1975 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1975 Triumph 2000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (106 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1975 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (149 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1975 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Cortina | 2000 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 149 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |