1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1978 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1978 Datsun 280Z is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Datsun 280Z (150 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Datsun 280Z (221 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1978 Datsun 280Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 1978 Datsun 280Z | |
| Make | Ford | Datsun |
| Model | Cortina | 280Z |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2753 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 79 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4399 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1631 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2304 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |
