1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1980 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1980 Toyota Carina is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Carina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Carina (75 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Carina should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Carina (115 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1980 Toyota Carina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1980 Toyota Carina | |
Make | Ford | Toyota |
Model | Cortina | Carina |
Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 115 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 70 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |