1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1985 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 1985 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1985 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP) has 134 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1985 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1985 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Ford Cortina | 1985 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Ford | Chevrolet |
| Model | Cortina | Astro |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1985 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 183 HP |
| Torque | 90 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 88.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2830 mm |
