1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1992 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1992 Suzuki Alto is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (49 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1992 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 1992 Suzuki Alto.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (90 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Suzuki Alto. (60 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1992 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Cortina | Alto |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 38 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 60 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 68.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 72 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2180 mm |