1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 MCC Smart (53 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Cortina | Smart |
Year Released | 1963 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1460 mm |