1963 Ford Cortina vs. 1999 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (187 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1999 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Land Rover Range Rover (320 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 1999 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 1999 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Cortina | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2750 mm |