1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Ford Escape
To start off, 2000 Ford Escape is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Escape (200 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 2000 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Ford Cortina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Escape (272 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Escape will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2000 Ford Escape | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Cortina | Escape |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 272 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |