1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Ford Laser
To start off, 2000 Ford Laser is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Ford Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Laser (105 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Laser should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Ford Laser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Laser (145 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (90 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2000 Ford Laser | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Cortina | Laser |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 105 HP |
Torque | 90 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 58.1 mm | 81.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2620 mm |