1963 Ford Cortina vs. 2000 Noble M12
To start off, 2000 Noble M12 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ford Cortina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ford Cortina would be higher. At 2,544 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Noble M12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Noble M12 (307 HP) has 258 more horse power than 1963 Ford Cortina. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Noble M12 should accelerate faster than 1963 Ford Cortina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Ford Cortina weights approximately 243 kg more than 2000 Noble M12.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Noble M12 (435 Nm) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Ford Cortina. (85 Nm). This means 2000 Noble M12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Ford Cortina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Ford Cortina | 2000 Noble M12 | |
Make | Ford | Noble |
Model | Cortina | M12 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1558 cc | 2544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 307 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 435 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 82.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.6 mm | 79.5 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1223 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2440 mm |